There are a few business urban legends I’ve heard over the years that I try to trace down. It’s interesting to me because some seem simple to source, but end up being not so simple. I try to find the source for Drucker’s quote “culture eats strategy for breakfast” and a more esoteric one about chimpanzees forming a behavior to stop ladder climbers. I feel like there’s lots of these but, for now, it’s just these two and hope that these notes help save time for future citation searchers.
Trying to avoid passing on rumors
I find that I’m frequently trying to translate concepts and ideas between different groups of people, using metaphors and concepts that both groups can understand and get us closer to a shared idea. However, in trying to get to shared understanding, I don’t want to accidentally insert some fake stuff in that shared reality. A common understanding that includes a lie or inaccuracy can end up taking up lots of time figuring out and fixing. So as much as possible, I like to cite the source for facts and ideas as I think it helps to both encourage better discussion and understanding and to serve as a check on my natural laziness 1 to prevent me from wanting to believe something is true by forcing me to track down and find the citation.
It’s fun to talk about urban legends, but in a professional setting spending time on business urban legends is better spent on working on whatever we’re supposed to work on.
There are two particular ideas that I’ve wanted to use, but never easily been able to find the actual source:
- “Culture eats strategy for breakfast,” attributed to Peter Drucker, is great for trying to convey how important it is to work on organizational culture because if the people in an org have shared values, vision, and practices that will work better than any particular strategy or single idea, especially if it goes against culture.
- Groupthinking chimpanzees stopping each other from climbing a ladder. I have no idea where this comes from, but is great to explain systems where unexplained behaviors exist and no one knows the source.
I expect most people know a bit about Drucker so I’ll talk about chimpanzees first.
The chimpanzee story goes like this…
- There’s an experiment where a scientist set up a room that had 10 chimpanzees. He set up the room with two way mirrors so he could see in, but the chimps couldn’t see out.
- He added a ladder in the center with a bucket of bananas at the top.
- When a single chimp tries to climb the ladder, the scientist would toss freezing water onto all the chimps until they stopped trying to climb. Eventually all the chimps stopped bothering because any attempt to get the bananas would result in a freezing bath.
- The scientist would replace one chimp so there were 9 chimps who had been frozen so didn’t bother and one new chimp. The new chimp would try to get the bananas and get cold water and then stop.
- The scientist kept rotating chimps and the exiting chimps would stop the new chimp from trying as they didn’t like the freezing water either. So it got to the point where new chimps never even got frozen, because they would be stopped before they got far enough to trigger freezing water.
- A new chimp would come in, get clobbered by the others, and eventually stop trying to get to the ladder. And they would join the pack in stopping the next new chimps.
- As chimps got replaced, eventually there were no chimps who ever got the frozen water, but they all had the behavior ingrained in them to stop any attempts up the ladder. But they didn’t have a real reason why, they just had the group behavior without the causative reason.
I don’t think this is real, but I want to use it so much because there are many processes where we can get stuck in a circular reasoning loop of “I do it because it’s always been done. It’s always been done this way because we do it this way.”
Of course, using first principles analysis helps to break out of this loop, but it’s such a nice story to illustrate the potential history of how we can get stuck in these situations.
I wanted to use this in a speech, and spent a few hours trying to find the source and never did. Not only can I not find the experiment, I can’t even find the person to first tell the story. I hate not being able to give credit to who invented stuff.
For example, here’s a cartoon version of the story I found on Skeptics StackExchange but I’m not sure they created the image, they were just asking about it. And a google reverse image search on the imgur link gives lots of hits, but no clear provenance.
Skeptics StackExchange User Flimzy seems to have the closest answer in finding a book by Galef in 1976 that references a paper by Stephenson in 1967. The experiment isn’t as described but seems true in principle. Flimzy links to the Galef book in Google books, but finding the journal article is a pain.
The citation in Galef’s book, Social Transmissions of Acquired Behavior_, is…
Stephenson, G. R. (1967). Cultural acquisition of a specific learned response among rhesus monkeys. In: Starek, D., Schneider, R., and Kuhn, H. J. (eds.), Progress in Primatology, Stuttgart: Fischer, pp. 279-288
But googling for a fifty year old journal doesn’t let me find the journal and directly download. I find something with that title on scribd with a date of 1966, but I’m not going to sign in to download it. And I wouldn’t want to force anyone following my citation to have to sign up for scribd just to check my work or follow my research. Thankfully other bloggers have been down this path and Erik Buys’ post includes a helpful link to a PDF of the article that he hosts on wordpress that is at least easy to download and looks like the real article. Thanks Erik, wherever you got this.
Although I would feel kind of off with a citation like…
Stephenson, G. R. (1967). Cultural acquisition of a specific learned response among rhesus monkeys. In: Starek, D., Schneider, R., and Kuhn, H. J. (eds.), Progress in Primatology, Stuttgart: Fischer, pp. 279-288 via https://erikbuys.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/cultural-acquisition-of-a-specific-learned-response-among-rhesus-monkeys-gordon-r-stephenson.pdf, accessed 2021-06-06.
So this business urban legend ends up being partially true, but in the actual experiment it’s not as “juicy” and is a harder story to tell accurately. On page 284, Stephenson describes the experiment so a conditioned monkey stops a newcomer from interacting with the “banana” equivalent from my chimpanzee story, and the newcomer doesn’t interact with it. And air blasts were used rather than freezing cold water, But at least there’s always someone who knows the reason not to interact. Sadly, they didn’t continue on with a third monkey who never received the air blast to stop them. And there’s some sex in this real version…
The demonstrator subject, upon being placed in the apparatus, retired to the end furthest from his conditioning object. The naive subject, when placed into the apparatus ten seconds later, first went to and mounted the demonstrator subject, then proceeded to the object without hesitation, looked at it and slowly reached out towards it. At this moment, the demonstrator subject came from the far end of the apparatus, grabbed the naive subject by the flanks and pulled him away. The object remained in place on the board. The demonstrator then turned and sexually presented to the naive partner. The naive partner, although it subsequently approached the object several times, did not touch the object in the remaining 14 minutes of the session.
Knowing the potential origin of this urban legend at least lets me feel like less of a fraud, but still doesn’t let me stick to my plan of always providing a citation to the original source. Maybe if I’m lucky, someone like Gladwell can write a book and describe the experiment, but I don’t think having a citation to a Gladwell book is very good for establishing ethos and shared reality.
I think I first heard the quote way back in business school and must have heard this hundreds, or thousands of times. So much so that I wouldn’t want to use it in a presentation for fear of boring the audience. But I wanted to cite it in an internal analysis note to try to make a case for assessing potential strategies proposed with organizational and partner culture. Basically just a general pointer that this isn’t a random idea from me, but something that is sort of baseline in strategic plans.
But, oddly, this was harder than I thought to actually cite where Drucker brought up this idea and after googling for an hour or so I discarded the idea and didn’t end up using the reference. It was interesting how many sites quote this without actually referencing a book or paper or article from Drucker where he says this.
This was a few years ago and now we have the wonderful work of the Quote Investigator web site that I am so grateful for tracing down and investigating where these things come from. They go back as far as 2000 with a reference to an unnamed person from the technology consulting firm, Giga Information Group. So it seems no one knows the actual person who came up with this quote but doesn’t seem to be Drucker and likely isn’t anyone where saying the name would convey any authority. I certainly can’t think of an audience where quoting Giga Information Group (or even their founder Gartner or the Gartner firm) would be very helpful in establishing ethos. It’s probably the equivalent of quoting wikipedia as the sole source for an idea, rather than a collection of facts.
Not sure why this is misattributed to Drucker, but I think because so much of Drucker’s good management books do seem to have the general idea that culture is more important than any distinct action. Of course, he worked in management and so it makes sense that he would write about how the people of an organization and collected culture was the most important thing to work on.
It’s funny because my own memory made me think I had heard this in the 90s in business school and again in the early 2000s. If Giga coined this expression, I couldn’t have heard it in the 90s and it was pretty unlikely that I heard it in the early 2000s. Just another example of how memory cannot always be trusted and citations are even more helpful.
This all seems to head toward why I like to cite and trace the citations of others because it helps to actually understand what the underlying basis is for things. It’s boring, and I frequently want to skip it, but is worth the time spent. Both to help others not have to go through the effort to find sources and also to avoid misusing and further the spread of misinformation, even accidentally.
Future Blog Ideas
Steve Yegge’s excellent Google Plus post about platforms references an Amazon “Big Mandate” email that made people use APIs or they would be fired. I’ve never found a real copy of this email and would like to know how much is true and how much is conflated. Comically, Yegge’s post is harder to find because of the Google Plus fiasco and now relies on people rehosting. One of many examples why archive.org and the ideas around ipfs are so important so information doesn’t get lost, or worse, slightly and imperceptibly modified.
Stuff I Read While Working on This Post (That You Might Want to Read Too)
- Wikipedia List of Urban Legends
- Peter F Drucker Wikipedia bio
- The ‘Monkey Ladder’: A Famous Social Experiemnt
- Was the experiment with five monkeys, a ladder, a banana and a water spray conducted?
- “10 Hungry Monkeys”, A Story of Cultural Training
- 5 Monkeys, Bananas, Ladder, Water. Why do we comply with daft rules in organisations?
- Answers.com Did the monkey banana and water spray experiment ever take place?
- Foolish Monkeys
- Culture eats strategy for breakfast
- Quote Investigator Culture Eats Strategy for Breakfast